CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION
www.chrc-ccdp.gc.ca
Home > Resources > Legislation > Factum > Factum - Air Canada
File No.: 30323
SUPREME COURT OF CANADA(On Appeal from the Federal Court of Appeal)
BETWEEN:
AIR CANADA
Appellant
- and -
Respondent
CANADIAN UNION OF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES(AIRLINE DIVISION)
FACTUM OF THE RESPONDENT,CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION
TABLE OF CONTENT
COPIES SENT TO
PART I - STATEMENT OF FACTS
Nature of the AppealCUPE's Pay Equity Complaints
PART II - QUESTIONS IN ISSUE
PART III - STATEMENT OF ARGUMENT
Standard of Review This Appeal Only Concerns Human Rights Legislation and its Proper Interpretation Occupational Segregation and Pay Inequity Section 11 Was Passed to Address, Inter Alia, Occupational Segregation The Purpose of the Establishment Requirement in Section 11The Development of Guidelines Dealing with Establishment Section 10 of the Guidelines The Use of the Word "Include""Notwithstanding Any Collective Agreement Applicable to Any Employees of the Establishment"The Practical Impact of a Functional Approach No Conflict Between Human Rights Legislation and Labour Legislation Conclusion
Standard of Review This Appeal Only Concerns Human Rights Legislation and its Proper Interpretation Occupational Segregation and Pay Inequity Section 11 Was Passed to Address, Inter Alia, Occupational Segregation The Purpose of the Establishment Requirement in Section 11The Development of Guidelines Dealing with Establishment Section 10 of the Guidelines
The Use of the Word "Include""Notwithstanding Any Collective Agreement Applicable to Any Employees of the Establishment"
The Practical Impact of a Functional Approach No Conflict Between Human Rights Legislation and Labour Legislation Conclusion
PART IV - COSTS
PART V - ORDERS SOUGHT
PART VI - TABLE OF AUTHORITIES
PART VII - STATUTORY PROVISIONS