
Along with consensus regarding the diagnosis being established, recognition of environmental sensitivities by decision-makers and in medical education is also necessary.
This section examines recognition of environmental sensitivities by international bodies, by levels of government and agencies, and by the health care community in Canada.
International recognition of environmental sensitivities
International recognition
Numerous countries have recognized environmental sensitivities in a variety of manners.
Table 2: International recognition of environmental sensitivities
Country/Region | Type of Recognition |
International | ASHRAE examined air quality standards for industrial settings in the USA and Germany, and concluded that standards are not set to protect environmentally sensitive individuals. Many are set to address irritation over the short term. c Prominent scientists signed the Benevento Resolution (February 2006) affirming that there is considerable and strengthening scientific evidence that low-intensity, low-frequency and radio-frequency electromagnetic fields are responsible for biological effects and health effects. Scientists called for more research, and a more precautionary a pproach to standards, recommended exposures and technologies in the market place.43 |
Europe | Landmark legislation for Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and restriction of Chemicals (REACH) was passed in December 2006. Requiring substitution of materials with less-toxic alternatives, which will affect building materials, finishing products, furnishings and equipment.44 |
United States | Prevalence has been measured, based upon doctor diagnoses, and self-reporting |
Germany | Multiple chemical sensitivity is formally recognized by the national health care system. The German General Medical Council supported extensive education of medical practitioners regarding environmental medicine, and evidence-based therapies are being developed.45 |
Denmark | The Danish Environmental Protection Agency recently published a report on multiple chemical sensitivity. It concluded that there is ample evidence that sensitivities are due to environmental contaminants, and that Danish initiatives to minimize off-gassing materials in the indoor environment may have contributed to a somewhat lower incidence in the Danish population. The Agency recommended that measures be taken to prevent the development of sensitivities.46 |
Sweden | Electrical hypersensitivity is recognized as a disability Health care facilities with very low electromagnetic fields and radiation are in place for sensitive individuals.6 |
Kazakhstan | Issued a decree limiting radiofrequencies in wiring to 50 millivolts (microsurges) to decrease "negative influence of physical factors on human health" (November 6, 2003) |
Classification of Diseases
The classification of diseases plays an important role in the recognition of and research into medical conditions.
The International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD) is a long-standing, ongoing international effort to categorize all causes and manifestations of disease. It is compiled and regularly updated by the World Health Organization,47,48 and it is used as a basis for the provision of health care within Canada.
The ICD-9 includes some relevant categories such as Ill-defined conditions, Injury and poisonings, Late effects of poisoning due to drug and biological substances, Poisoning by drugs and biological substances, and Late toxic effects of non-medical substances. In the most recent version, ICD-10,49 "environmental sensitivities" is not listed, but the related conditions of Chronic fatigue and Fibromyalgia have now been included. Many other possibly related conditions are also listed, such as Arthritis due to hypersensitivity. In an update of the ICD-10, wood preservatives have been recognized as causing disease.48
The ICD is an ongoing project. Recent recognition of environmental causes of ill health, and conditions related to environmental sensitivities are good steps toward a more comprehensive system for the classification of diseases.
Recognition of environmental sensitivities by the Canadian federal government and national bodies
Table 3 highlights some initiatives taken by the Canadian federal government and national bodies.
Table 3: Recognition of environmental sensitivities by the Canadian federal government and national bodies
Federal government / National bodies | Recognition |
Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI) | CIHI is a not-for-profit independent organization created by Canada’s federal, provincial and territorial governments that collects, analyzes and disseminates information on health and health care in Canada. It reviews and publishes the ICD for the Canadian context, which includes diagnoses relevant to environmental sensitivities. |
Health Canada | Health Canada’s diverse roles include monitoring of health, regulation of drugs and pesticides, and public education. It cooperates with other departments such as Environment Canada and Statistics Canada regarding health and the environment, and regulation of toxic chemicals. Health Canada, CIHI and Statistics Canada included questions on chemical sensitivities in the 2003 Canadian Community Health Survey,10 and the 2005 National Survey of the Work and Health of Nurses.11 "Healthy Environments for Canadians" (HSPB 88-12), a 1988 report for Health and Welfare Canada, addressed many issues that remain unresolved to this day, such as the health effects of common pesticides and other toxic chemicals. It discusses environmental sensitivities, with special mention of children and the homeless, and it includes a 243-page annotated bibliography. Health Canada promotes scent-free policies, in part because of environmental sensitivities.50 The Canadian Health Network, of the Public Health Agency of Canada, defines chemical sensitivity on its website.51 The Pest Management Regulatory Agency, within Health Canada, is the federal regulator for pesticides. The agency recognizes people with environmental sensitivities as a vulnerable population.52,53 |
Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety | This federal departmental corporation reports to the Parliament of Canada through the federal Minister of Labour. It recognizes multiple chemical sensitivities, sick building syndrome and indoor air quality as important occupational health and safety issues.54 |
The CMHC has produced many publications on environmental sensitivities, including books on housing that incorporate innovative design features, materials and construction, indoor air quality, ventilation, heating and cooling, and dealing with moulds and bacterial contamination. A demonstration house for environmentally hypersensitive people was built in Ottawa, and was the site of a 2006 announcement of federal initiatives addressing toxic chemicals. | |
The NRC has researched indoor air quality extensively in the laboratory and in the field - in homes, commercial buildings, hospitals, and schools. Research topics include characterization and health effects of contaminants; ventilation, heating and cooling; energy-efficiency; and building envelope air-tightness. | |
Royal Society of Canada | The Royal Society of Canada published a series of reports on the health effects of radiofrequency fields from wireless telecommunications devices.55,56 The Society concluded in the most recent report that more research is needed. |
Recognition of environmental sensitivities by Canadian provincial bodies
Recognition of environmental sensitivities at the provincial level may translate into funding and access to optimum health care. Sensitivities may also be recognized with regulation of environmental agents such as pesticides, air pollution and scents, and through public education.
Provincial bodies
Ministries of Health
Physicians bill provincial ministries of health according to services rendered, and must note conditions treated. Some provinces still use the ICD-9, while others are gradually making the transition to the ICD-10. There is now a code for chronic fatigue syndrome in the Ontario diagnostic categories list, and a time-based service code. When the complexity of the condition necessitates time-consuming consultations, this allows the physician to bill accordingly.
Provincial bodies engage in anti-smoking, pesticide-reduction and scent-free initiatives, which benefit people with environmental sensitivities. Table 4 describes a few examples of these initiatives.
Table 4: Provincial Ministry of Health recognition of environmental sensitivities
Province/Territory | Recognition |
Nunavut, NWT, New Brunswick, Manitoba, Saskatchewan, Newfoundland and Labrador, Ontario, Quebec, Nova Scotia | As of July, 2006, smoking was banned in restaurants and bars in 9 out of 13 provinces and territories.57 |
Quebec | Quebec has Canada’s only provincial Pesticide Code, banning and restricting pesticides for landscaping.58 The province has also taken the position that it would only consider spraying pesticides to kill adult mosquitoes in response to a true West Nile virus epidemic, noting that there is no evidence of effectiveness for disease reduction.59 |
Ontario | The Government of Ontario was the primary funder for the development of the manual "Playing it Safe: Service Provider Strategies to Reduce Environmental Risks to Pre-conception, Pre-natal and Child Health," as part of a "child-proofing" campaign by BestStart: Ontario’s Maternal, Newborn and Early Child Development Resource Centre and the Canadian Partnership for Children’s Health and the Environment. |
Alberta | Alberta Health is involved in air quality (both indoor and outdoor), tobacco, and children’s health, as well as discussions on bottled water and the Kyoto Protocol. |
Saskatchewan | Saskatchewan Health recognizes that health is linked to the environment, with numerous public education activities. With a large farming population using pesticides, it also promotes screening for cholinesterase activity. |
Clinics researching and treating environmental sensitivities
In the mid 1980s, the government of Ontario appointed an Ad Hoc Committee on Environmental Hypersensitivity Disorders, chaired by Judge George Thomson ("Thomson Committee").60 The 1985 report produced by the Committee found that environmental (hyper)sensitivity was a significant problem requiring further research, and that patients were not having their needs met within the health care system. The Thomson Committee’s recommendations and subsequent progress are summarized in Appendix D. Following the Committee’s recommendations, the Ontario Ministry of Health funded the Environmental Hypersensitivity Research Unit at the University of Toronto in 1994, and opened the Environmental Health Clinic at Women’s College Hospital in 1996.
After a six-year pilot project,61 the Nova Scotia Environmental Health Centre was established at a permanent site in 1997. This facility is associated with Dalhousie University and includes Canada’s only environmental control unit for treatment and research.
Occupational health and safety – Workers’ Compensation Boards
Some provincial workers’ compensation boards recognize environmental sensitivities, but eligible conditions and nomenclature vary across jurisdictions. According to the Association of Workers’ Compensation Boards of Canada, as well as a discussion paper prepared for WorkSafeBC,62 a national framework common to all jurisdictions with respect to environmental sensitivities does not exist. Information about the recognition of environmental sensitivities by workers’ compensation boards is presented in Table 5.
Table 5: Recognition of environmental sensitivities and possibly-related conditions on Workers’ Compensation Boards websites
BC | AB | SK | MB | ON | QB | NB | NS | NL | PE | YK | NT & NU | |
Environmental sensitivities/illness | X | X | ||||||||||
Multiple chemical sensitivity | X | |||||||||||
Sick building syndrome | X | |||||||||||
Chronic pain | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||||
Chronic fatigue | X | |||||||||||
Fibromyalgia | X | X | X | X | ||||||||
Nervous System Disorder including solvent-induced neurotoxicity | X | |||||||||||
"Allergy" to formaldehyde or VOCs | X | |||||||||||
Toxic neuropathy | X | |||||||||||
Myofascial pain | X | X | ||||||||||
Temporomandibular joint disorders | X | |||||||||||
Brain injuries with persisting neurological deficit | X | |||||||||||
Organic brain syndrome | X | X | ||||||||||
Somatoform pain disorder | X | |||||||||||
Respiratory disorders related to acute or chronic workplace exposures | X | |||||||||||
Indoor air issues | X | X | X | X | ||||||||
Special treatment for pregnant and nursing women | X | |||||||||||
Limited or no information on website / search facility ineffective | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
Note: While various websites offer some information about environmental sensitivities, the information may not be always easily accessible.
Municipal Public Health
Many public health departments provide advice regarding smoking, scents, pesticides and idling of vehicles. This advice may lead to policies and bylaws within municipalities. The following are some examples.
In Ontario, local public health departments address smoking, scents, pesticides and vehicle idling. Special consideration may be given to people with environmental sensitivities in the event that pesticides are sprayed against mosquitoes carrying West Nile virus. Ottawa Public Health instituted a voluntary registry so that people with environmental sensitivities will receive increased notice should the city consider fogging with malathion in response to West Nile virus. Ottawa also has a safe public housing project for people with environmental sensitivities. The Region of Peel is studying fragrances from laundry facilities.
Many Canadian cities,d including most capitals, have anti-idling bylaws or policies (e.g. for vehicle fleets), idling-free zones (e.g. around schools) or educational initiatives. These are for both energy conservation and cleaner air.
Halifax was the first major Canadian city to enact a pesticide bylaw. As well, municipal employees who became sensitive to chlorine in public swimming facilities have been accommodated with changes in place of work.
Almost 130 cities in Canada now restrict the use of pesticides on private property, in part to protect people with environmental sensitivities.63
Calgary Public Health has no-scent, latex and pesticides policies. A ban on smoking in public places is coming in 2007. Unlike most Canadian provinces, Alberta does not have provincial no-smoking legislation.
Since diagnostic criteria for chemical sensitivity have been accepted internationally and in Canada, the recognition of environmental sensitivities at all levels of government has been steadily increasing. Environmental sensitivities and some related conditions are also eligible for compensation by some Workers’ Compensation Boards, although there is marked inconsistency across the country. Public policy and regulations are advancing to protect people from tobacco smoke, pesticides, fragrances, vehicle exhaust and other chemicals in public places, and to minimize risks of exposures to pesticides for people with sensitivities.
Awareness of environmental sensitivities by health care practitioners
The mandate of the Canadian Medical Association is "To serve and unite the physicians of Canada and be the national advocate, in partnership with the people of Canada, for the highest standards of health and health care". The medical associations at the national and provincial levels do not formally "recognize" diseases, although they do engage in limited advocacy such as a resolution calling for banning of "weed and feed" type products.64 A 1995 letter on behalf of the Ontario Medical Association to the Ontario Ministry of Education Special Education Advisory Council urged that "multiple sensitivities syndrome" be recognized and dealt with as a disability and that environmental improvements be made to accommodate children with this special need. As well, articles have been published in the Canadian Medical Association Journal on environmental sensitivities.65-68
The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada (RCPSC) is a national, private, non-profit organization th at oversees the medical education of specialists in Canada. It notes on its website, "In recognition of employees who experience allergic reactions, asthma or migraine headaches due to chemical sensitivities, the Royal College supports a scent-free environment and requests that employees refrain from using scented products such as perfumes, aftershaves, air-fresheners, etc., during working hours."
The Environmental Health Committee of the Ontario College of Family Physicians (OCFP) is taking the lead within the College of Family Physicians of Canada on environmental health, as well as in the World Organization of Family Doctors. Not only are environmental sensitivities recognized, they are carrying out education on diagnosis and treatment, as well as many other environmental health initiatives.
The Canadian Society of Environmental Medicine is a national organization for education, advocacy and research, and supports health care workers treating environmental sensitivities.
An important voice for environmental health in Canada is the Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment. This organization is composed mostly of physicians, who bring their health expertise to environmental issues.
Medical schools and continuing medical education
Environmental sensitivities have not historically been included explicitly in medical school curricula. Connections between environment and health are typically addressed under courses such as "Individual and Population Health," with a couple of hour-long lectures during the entire medical education. An "exposure history," a crucial step in diagnosing environmental sensitivities,65,69 is covered only in the context of occupational health, rather than as a core concept.
Continuing Professional Development or Continuing Medical Education is required for fellows of the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons, as well as for members of the College of Family Physicians of Canada. Credits are earned for courses, conferences and seminars. Diverse courses are available through numerous organizations, and individuals choose which to take. The OCFP offers Continuing Medical Education regarding environmental sensitivities and taking of a comprehensive patient history. Workshops have also been part of the Annual Scientific Assembly of the OCFP for the past four years, and been included in the annual "Family Medicine Forum" sponsored by the College of Family Physicians of Canada. As well, the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-term Care and Health Canada helped fund an Environmental Health Peer Presenter program for physicians, whereby physicians from various regions were trained to give seminars on environmental health to other health care professionals close to home.
In 2006, an Environmental Health Scholar was designated by the OCFP in each medical school in Ontario, in part to incorporate environmental health into the undergraduate medical curriculum.
Environmental sciences are increasingly popular in university education, with courses offered through many departments such as geography, engineering or sciences; some of these courses link to health sciences.
Awareness and recognition of chronic health conditions evolves over time, and on several levels. Initial reporting by a few patients and physicians leads to awareness, research and formal agreement regarding diagnosis. Further research explores causes, mechanisms, diagnostic tests and treatment strategies, which are then formally put into practice.
International, national, provincial and municipal governments have recognized conditions related to environmental sensitivities. This has led to funding for clinical health care programs and facilities. Public and political awareness are particularly important for conditions such as environmental sensitivities, because recognition of environmental causes has diverse implications for many interests in society.
The medical community is increasingly acknowledging environmental sensitivities in medical education. Scent-free and least-toxic cleaning policies, and advocacy for smoking, vehicle idling and pesticides policies and laws are increasing.
c. ANSI/ASHRAE Addendum c to ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 62.1-2004, American Society of Heating, Refrigeration and Air-conditioning Engineers, Inc., Atlanta, Georgia.
d. Including Ottawa, Toronto, Montreal, Vancouver, Calgary, Edmonton, Regina, Winnipeg, Mississauga, Markham, Oshawa, London, Halifax, St. John’s and all of PEI and Quebec
| Previous Page | Table of Contents | Next Page |